Julian Lindley-French offers good reasons why NATO-led state-building in Libya can be more successful than US efforts in Iraq and NATO efforts in Afghanistan: The situation is better to start, and we have learned key lessons from those two earlier efforts. I agree with him! Those who warned that intervention would fail in Libya, leaving an endless stalement, civil war, and divided nation were wrong. Those who are now warning that state-building efforts will fail can be proven wrong as well. Also, check out the discussion at the US Institute of Peace’s International Network for Economics and Conflict website, which has a good discussion of Libya reconstruction issues.
-
Recent Posts
- Round and round the financial world
- Is it too late for Syria?
- Blogging is back!
- Blogging will return
- Blowing Bubbles
- When did the US stop thinking big? Look at EDUCATION!
- War — what is it good for?
- Why we mess up
- Is Terror back?
- Tragedy in Boston
- In Surprise, Recovery in China Loses Steam
- Confused about North Korea? — Think Syria
- Told you so
- From Russia, with thought
- Relentless optimism?
Categories
- The Global Economy (51)
- The Middle East Revolts (33)
- U.S. Politics (50)
- Uncategorized (141)
Archives