Deer in the Headlights

It seems that global financial leaders are starting to recognize that there is no hope of dragging the Greek crisis along until it somehow resolves without a default.    However, having spent two years getting to this point, they now need to find a solution fast, before bank panics spread.

This will be a tough week — two weeks ago Doug McWilliams gave Europe a month to solve this crisis before markets crash.  Yet the crashing has begun, and now it’s a matter of days until markets either see a way out, or decide that there is no plan.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government is four days from another shutdown if Congressional leaders cannot resolve a minor disagreement over how to fund emergency responses to Texas wildfires and New England floods.

What is wrong with our leaders?  The answer is — nothing.  It is a story that has been repeated throughout history.  I began my comparative historical and political studies motivated by one question:  how do government leaders, with access to all the experts and all the knowledge their nations command, so often make terrible mistakes?  Why do they so often blunder into unwanted wars, depressions, riots, revolutions?

The answer turned out to be simple.  First, political leaders are politicians first, leaders second.  They have spent their lives figuring out how to get into, and stay in, the offices they hold.  So their instinct is always to do what must be done to win the next election.

If every leader is focused on the next election, however, then putting short-term political issues ahead of long-term national interests is wise policy.  Anything else is political suicide.  Term limits are designed to erase this problem, but they bring problems of their own — a different kind of short-termism (grab what you can while in power, and kick problems down the road when they will explode on someone else’s watch).   Second term U.S. presidents are perhaps the only ones free of this problem, but even they are stymied by a Congress that views them as lame ducks and is concerned to do what will continue their careers, not what will hand a long-term victory to a departing President.

So here we are in the third year of a major global depression with leaders who for the last three years have been seeking short-term politically attractive options.  But now those short-term options have failed to stem the economic downturn, and instead have pushed several countries into growing debt problems.  We need a major, coordinated push for global refinancing, debt write-offs, and stimulus.

However, those in power the last few years are loathe to admit they didn’t do enough; those in opposition are eager to claim the leaders did too much.  Neither knows how to escape the short-term political pressures to do something acceptable to their core supporters, even if that won’t solve the major problems.

So if leaders look like deer in the headlights — suddenly in the spotlight with no idea where to turn — that is why.

About jackgoldstone

Hazel Professor of Public Policy at George Mason University
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Deer in the Headlights

  1. Nick says:

    Would be interested in your views on the notion that constitutional separation of powers cannot handle a situation in which the two parties are as deeply divided ideologically (so unable to compromise) as they are today. Or, putting the issue in terms of what seems to be the consensus outside the US, that the Republicans have moved too far to the right in effectively seeking to repeal the New Deal.

    • Nick, checks and balances lead to paralysis when the parties cannot find middle ground. The founding fathers believed that factions could not dominate in a large, diverse polity — any group seeking the broad support required to win election could not hold extreme views.

      That has changed somewhat with television, a primary system that rewards high turnout, and redistricting of Congress that works against the diversity of the country by grouping like-minded voters together in single districts The result is a Congress (not the senate, not the president) with many extremist members who are using a veto-like power. We saw this just this week when Boehner could not get the Republicans to pass his own legislation to extend Federal government funding. So I think the real problem is not separation of powers, but the way Congressmen and women are now elected in safe, single-party districts where TV and primaries back extreme candidates who can then win.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s